Reading PAGE

Peer Evaluation activity

Trusted by 1
Downloads 1
Views 5
Followed by 1

Total impact ?

    Send a

    Liviu has...

    Trusted 0
    Reviewed 0
    Emailed 0
    Shared/re-used 0
    Discussed 0
    Invited 0
    Collected 0

     

    This was brought to you by:

    block this user Liviu Nicolaescu Trusted member

    Assistant Professor

    University of Notre Dame

    Compositio Math. 144 (2008) 1081�1106 doi:10.1112/S0010437X08003680 Counting Morse functions on the 2-sphere

    Export to Mendeley

    We count how many different Morse functions exist on the 2-sphere. There are several ways of declaring that two Morse functions f and g are indistinguishable but we concentrate only on two natural equivalence relations: homological (when the regular sublevel sets f and g have identical Betti numbers) and geometric (when f is obtained from g via global, orientation-preserving changes of coordinates on S 2 and R). The count of homological classes is reduced to a count of lattice paths confined to the first quadrant. The count of geometric classes is reduced to a count of certain labeled trees, which is encoded by certain elliptic integrals. 1. The main problem Suppose that X is a smooth compact, oriented manifold without boundary. Following Thom, we say that a smooth function f: X ? R is an excellent Morse function if all of its critical points are nondegenerate, and no two of them lie on the same level set. We denote by MX the space of excellent Morse functions on X. In the remainder of this introduction a Morse function will by default be excellent.

    Oh la laClose

    Your session has expired but don’t worry, your message
    has been saved.Please log in and we’ll bring you back
    to this page. You’ll just need to click “Send”.

    Your evaluation is of great value to our authors and readers. Many thanks for your time.

    Review Close

    Short review
    Select a comment
    Select a grade
    You and the author
    Anonymity My review is anonymous( Log in  or  Register )
    publish
    Close

    When you're done, click "publish"

    Only blue fields are mandatory.

    Relation to the author*
    Overall Comment*
    Anonymity* My review is anonymous( Log in  or  Register )
     

    Focus & Objectives*

    Have the objectives and the central topic been clearly introduced?

    Novelty & Originality*

    Do you consider this work to be an interesting contribution to knowledge?

    Arrangement, Transition and Logic

    Are the different sections of this work well arranged and distributed?

    Methodology & Results

    Is the author's methodology relevant to both the objectives and the results?

    Data Settings & Figures

    Were tables and figures appropriate and well conceived?

    References and bibliography

    Is this work well documented and has the bibliography been properly established?

    Writing

    Is this work well written, checked and edited?

    Write Your Review (you can paste text as well)
    Please be civil and constructive. Thank you.


    Grade (optional, N/A by default)

    N/A 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 10
    Close

    Your mailing list is currently empty.
    It will build up as you send messages
    and links to your peers.

     No one besides you has access to this list.
    Close
    Enter the e-mail addresses of your recipients in the box below.  Note: Peer Evaluation will NOT store these email addresses   log in
    Your recipients

    Your message:

    Your email : Your email address will not be stored or shared with others.

    Your message has been sent.

    Description

    Title : Compositio Math. 144 (2008) 1081�1106 doi:10.1112/S0010437X08003680 Counting Morse functions on the 2-sphere
    Abstract : We count how many different Morse functions exist on the 2-sphere. There are several ways of declaring that two Morse functions f and g are indistinguishable but we concentrate only on two natural equivalence relations: homological (when the regular sublevel sets f and g have identical Betti numbers) and geometric (when f is obtained from g via global, orientation-preserving changes of coordinates on S 2 and R). The count of homological classes is reduced to a count of lattice paths confined to the first quadrant. The count of geometric classes is reduced to a count of certain labeled trees, which is encoded by certain elliptic integrals. 1. The main problem Suppose that X is a smooth compact, oriented manifold without boundary. Following Thom, we say that a smooth function f: X ? R is an excellent Morse function if all of its critical points are nondegenerate, and no two of them lie on the same level set. We denote by MX the space of excellent Morse functions on X. In the remainder of this introduction a Morse function will by default be excellent.
    Subject : unspecified
    Area : Mathematics
    Language : English
    Affiliations
    Url : http://www.nd.edu/~lnicolae/MorseCountCompv3.pdf
    Doi : 10.1.1.139.7851

    Leave a comment

    This contribution has not been reviewed yet. review?

    You may receive the Trusted member label after :

    • Reviewing 10 uploads, whatever the media type.
    • Being trusted by 10 peers.
    • If you are blocked by 10 peers the "Trust label" will be suspended from your page. We encourage you to contact the administrator to contest the suspension.

    Does this seem fair to you? Please make your suggestions.

    Please select an affiliation to sign your evaluation:

    Cancel Evaluation Save

    Please select an affiliation:

    Cancel   Save

    Liviu's Peer Evaluation activity

    Liviu has...

    Trusted 0
    Reviewed 0
    Emailed 0
    Shared/re-used 0
    Discussed 0
    Invited 0
    Collected 0
    Invite this peer to...
    Title
    Start date (dd/mm/aaaa)
    Location
    URL
    Message
    send
    Close

    Full Text request

    Your request will be sent.

    Please enter your email address to be notified
    when this article becomes available

    Your email


     
    Your email address will not be shared or spammed.