Reading PAGE
Peer Evaluation activity
| Trusted by | 1 |
| Views | 5 |
Total impact ?
Send a 
Roman has...
| Trusted | 0 |
| Reviewed | 0 |
| Emailed | 0 |
| Shared/re-used | 0 |
| Discussed | 0 |
| Invited | 0 |
| Collected | 0 |
This was brought to you by:
Active Queue Management for Fair Bandwidth Allocation of Mixed Responsive and Non-Responsive Traffic Using a Clossed-Loop Congestion Control Scheme
Oh la la
Your session has expired but don’t worry, your message
has been saved.Please log in and we’ll bring you back
to this page. You’ll just need to click “Send”.
Your evaluation is of great value to our authors and readers. Many thanks for your time.
Your mailing list is currently empty.
It will build up as you send messages
and links to your peers.
Enter the e-mail addresses of your recipients in the box below. Note: Peer Evaluation will NOT store these email addresses log in
Your message has been sent.
Description
Title : Active Queue Management for Fair Bandwidth Allocation of Mixed Responsive and Non-Responsive Traffic Using a Clossed-Loop Congestion Control Scheme
Area : Computer Science
Language : English
Url : http://marcel.wanda.ch/Publications/pletka03active-techreport.pdf
Doi : 10.1.1.13.1897
Abstract : Today's known and widely used active queue management (AQM) schemes do not differentiate between packets from responsive (e.g., TCP sessions) and non-responsive traffic (e.g., UDP). This results in further widening the gap of unfair advantage already inherent to non-responsive traffic, as the responsive sender will significantly reduce its future transmit rate as a result of the congestion signals. As a simple work-around, responsive and non-responsive traffic are often assigned distinct AQM parameters. This approach however requires tuning for each traffic class that potentially depends on the current or expected offered load. In other words, responsiveness and TCPfriendliness cannot be estimated easily---not at last due to shortlived TCP sessions. In this paper we propose a closed-loop congestion control (CLCC) scheme on top of an existing AQM scheme to achieve fair bandwidth distribution among concurrent responsive and non-responsive traffic. The new scheme has the advantage that it does not need to estimate the level of responsiveness of traffic. We analyze our scheme on top of an existing rate-based AQM scheme known to approximate max-min fairness, and by means of simulations show that our extension significantly improves fair bandwidth allocation for responsive and non-responsive traffic.
Subject : unspecifiedArea : Computer Science
Language : English
| Affiliations : |
Doi : 10.1.1.13.1897
Leave a comment
This contribution has not been reviewed yet. review?
You may receive the Trusted member label after :
• Reviewing 10 uploads, whatever the media type.
• Being trusted by 10 peers.
• If you are blocked by 10 peers the "Trust label" will be suspended from your page. We encourage you to contact the administrator to contest the suspension.
Please select an affiliation to sign your evaluation:
Please select an affiliation:
Roman's Peer Evaluation activity
| Trusted by | 1 |
- FPeer Evaluation, Publisher, Peer Evaluation.
| Views | 5 |
- 2Adaptive End-to-End Quality-of-Service Guarantees in IP Networks using an Active Networking Approach
- 1A new Buffer Management Scheme for IP Differentiated Services
- 1Bandwidth Allocation for Non-Responsive Flows with Active Queue Management
- 1Bringing Efficient Advanced Queries to Distributed Hash Tables
Roman has...
| Trusted | 0 |
| Reviewed | 0 |
| Emailed | 0 |
| Shared/re-used | 0 |
| Discussed | 0 |
| Invited | 0 |
| Collected | 0 |
Full Text request
Your request will be sent.
Please enter your email address to be notified
when this article becomes available
Your email