Reading PAGE
Peer Evaluation activity
| Trusted by | 1 |
| Views | 5 |
| Followed by | 1 |
| Following... | 1 |
Total impact ?
Send a 
Stephan has...
| Trusted | 0 |
| Reviewed | 0 |
| Emailed | 0 |
| Shared/re-used | 0 |
| Discussed | 0 |
| Invited | 0 |
| Collected | 0 |
This was brought to you by:
Blended Learning: Towards a Mix for SMEs- Stakeholders and their Priorities
Oh la la
Your session has expired but don’t worry, your message
has been saved.Please log in and we’ll bring you back
to this page. You’ll just need to click “Send”.
Your evaluation is of great value to our authors and readers. Many thanks for your time.
Your mailing list is currently empty.
It will build up as you send messages
and links to your peers.
Enter the e-mail addresses of your recipients in the box below. Note: Peer Evaluation will NOT store these email addresses log in
Your message has been sent.
Description
Title : Blended Learning: Towards a Mix for SMEs- Stakeholders and their Priorities
Area : Computer Science
Language : English
Url : http://www.easy-hub.org/stephan/moebs-wbl2007.pdf
Doi : 10.1.1.79.5404
Abstract : Abstract. While blended learning seems to be quite suitable for small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs), current uptake of this learning method is low. In this paper we propose a research design to examine the requirements for blended learning in SMEs. It is based on a three-round ranking-type Delphi study. Participants for the panels were carefully selected. Our method takes into account that the area and the term of blended learning are discussed in very different, partially contradicting connotations. For this purpose, we first provide the background of the initial research question and describe our research design. Next, we present preliminary results of the Delphi study and the steps in preparation of round 2. Participants were selected for the online-Delphi and grouped into panels of SME learners, trainers and providers of e-learning as well as learners from large companies as a control group for the SME learners.
Subject : unspecifiedArea : Computer Science
Language : English
| Affiliations : |
Doi : 10.1.1.79.5404
Leave a comment
This contribution has not been reviewed yet. review?
You may receive the Trusted member label after :
• Reviewing 10 uploads, whatever the media type.
• Being trusted by 10 peers.
• If you are blocked by 10 peers the "Trust label" will be suspended from your page. We encourage you to contact the administrator to contest the suspension.
Please select an affiliation to sign your evaluation:
Please select an affiliation:
Stephan's Peer Evaluation activity
| Trusted by | 1 |
- FPeer Evaluation, Publisher, Peer Evaluation.
| Views | 5 |
- 2Advantages, Opportunities, and Limits of Empirical Evaluations: Evaluating Adaptive Systems
- 1A Decomposition Model for the Layered Evaluation of Interactive Adaptive Systems
- 1ABSTRACT MOBILE TECHNOLOGIES IN EDUCATION- UBIQUITOUS SCAFFOLDING AND SUPPORT FOR UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
- 1Adaptive learning courses in pedagogical psychology. The PSI project and the authoring system NetCoach.
| Followed by | 1 |
- FCarsten Ullrich, Research Associate, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering.
| Following... | 1 |
- FCarsten Ullrich, Research Associate, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering.
Stephan has...
| Trusted | 0 |
| Reviewed | 0 |
| Emailed | 0 |
| Shared/re-used | 0 |
| Discussed | 0 |
| Invited | 0 |
| Collected | 0 |
Full Text request
Your request will be sent.
Please enter your email address to be notified
when this article becomes available
Your email