Reading PAGE
Peer Evaluation activity
| Trusted by | 1 |
| Downloads | 2462 |
| Views | 51 |
| Full text requests | 1 |
| Collected by | 1 |
Total impact ?
Send a 
Aliaksandr has...
| Trusted | 0 |
| Reviewed | 1 |
| Emailed | 0 |
| Shared/re-used | 0 |
| Discussed | 0 |
| Invited | 0 |
| Collected | 1 |
This was brought to you by:
Followblock this user Aliaksandr Birukou Trusted member
Post Doctorate
DISI, University of Trento, Trento
Requirements, configuration management and traceability for safety critical software
Oh la la
Your session has expired but don’t worry, your message
has been saved.Please log in and we’ll bring you back
to this page. You’ll just need to click “Send”.
Your evaluation is of great value to our authors and readers. Many thanks for your time.
Your mailing list is currently empty.
It will build up as you send messages
and links to your peers.
Enter the e-mail addresses of your recipients in the box below. Note: Peer Evaluation will NOT store these email addresses log in
Your message has been sent.
Description
Title : Requirements, configuration management and traceability for safety critical software
Author(s) : G. Romanski
Area : Other
Language : English
Year : 2006
Conference_title : Proceedings of the fourth Industrial Simulation Conference 2006 ISC2006
Volume : 2006
Publisher : IEEE Comput. Soc
Pages : 304 -
Url : http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=1232773
Isbn : 0-7695-1980-6
Doi : 10.1109/ICRE.2003.1232773
Author(s) : G. Romanski
Abstract : Software requirements are the focal point from which traceability to all related artifacts are established during the certification of safety critical software. For the certification of air-borne software, the guidance document DO-178B, requires that the link between requirements, design, code and tests be documented and verified. The DO-178B document does not describe how this should be done, but it permits the reengineering of information that is missing, to support the certification of commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) products. Requirements were entered in a database and evolved through a sequence that enforced the states described in company process documents. The design descriptions, source code, tests, results and so on were maintained in a configuration management (CM) system. The final audit was successful and the CD-ROM delivery of a requirements based certification package was accepted and commended. The details of the approach and the lessons learned were presented.
Subject : unspecifiedArea : Other
Language : English
Year : 2006
| Affiliations : | DISI, University of Trento, Trento |
Volume : 2006
Publisher : IEEE Comput. Soc
Pages : 304 -
Url : http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=1232773
Isbn : 0-7695-1980-6
Doi : 10.1109/ICRE.2003.1232773
Leave a comment
This contribution has not been reviewed yet. review?
You may receive the Trusted member label after :
• Reviewing 10 uploads, whatever the media type.
• Being trusted by 10 peers.
• If you are blocked by 10 peers the "Trust label" will be suspended from your page. We encourage you to contact the administrator to contest the suspension.
Please select an affiliation to sign your evaluation:
Please select an affiliation:
Aliaksandr's Peer Evaluation activity
| Trusted by | 1 |
- FPeer Evaluation, Publisher, Peer Evaluation.
| Downloads | 2462 |
- 596LiquidPub D2.1 - Processes, Roles and Licensing Models for SKO Lifecycle Management (v2)
- 428LiquidPub D1.1. State of the art in modelling evolutionary, collaborative, and multi-faceted knowledge artefacts; analysis of reviews and modelling of reviewers' behaviour in peer review; computational trust, reputation models, and social network analysis
- 176LiquidPub D3.3. Simulation and validation of the behavioral models
- 168LiquidPub D3.1. Analysis of Reviewing Systems (public version)
- 153LiquidPub D3.2. Model of reviewers’ behavior in peer reviews
- 151Service for selecting patterns
- 148LiquidPub D2.2 Extension to other disciplines
- 139LiquidPub D1.2. SKO structure, evolution, and navigation models (v3)
- 137LiquidPub. D2.3 - LiquidPub processes plugins (v2)
- 132LiquidPub D1.3. LiquidPub Core Platform
- 130Liquid Publications Green Paper
- 104Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation
| Views | 51 |
- 13Service for selecting patterns
- 10Requirements, configuration management and traceability for safety critical software
- 6Liquid Publications Green Paper
- 3Liquid journals: scientific journals in the Web 2.0 era
- 3A Multi-Agent System that Facilitates Scientific Publications Search
- 3IC-service
- 3LiquidPub D1.3. LiquidPub Core Platform
- 2UCount : a Community-Driven Approach for Measuring Scientific Reputation
- 2Efficient rotation invariant object detection using boosted Random Ferns
- 2LiquidPub D1.1. State of the art in modelling evolutionary, collaborative, and multi-faceted knowledge artefacts; analysis of reviews and modelling of reviewers' behaviour in peer review; computational trust, reputation models, and social network analysis
- 2LiquidPub D3.1. Analysis of Reviewing Systems (public version)
- 1LiquidPub D1.2. SKO structure, evolution, and navigation models (v3)
- 1Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation
| Full text requests | 1 |
Title of the work: Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation
- Anonymous (1)
| Collected by | 1 |
- FAliaksandr Birukou, Post Doctorate, DISI, University of Trento, Trento.
Aliaksandr has...
| Trusted | 0 |
| Reviewed | 1 |
| Emailed | 0 |
| Shared/re-used | 0 |
| Discussed | 0 |
| Invited | 0 |
| Collected | 1 |
- Aliaksandr Birukou, Post Doctorate, DISI, University of Trento, Trento.
Full Text request
Your request will be sent.
Please enter your email address to be notified
when this article becomes available
Your email