Reading PAGE

Peer Evaluation activity

Downloads 1
Views 5
Full text requests 1
Following... 3

Total impact ?

    Send a

    José has...

    Trusted 0
    Reviewed 0
    Emailed 0
    Shared/re-used 0
    Discussed 0
    Invited 0
    Collected 0

     

    This was brought to you by:

    block this user José Palazzo M. de Oliveira Trusted member

    Professor

    UFRGS

    An Ontological Approach for the Quality Assessment of Computer Science Conferences

    Export to Mendeley

    Today the proliferation of the availability of the information of scientific events on the Web has created the necessity tooffer a quickly access to up-to-date information about the quality of these events. This requirement demands for (semi) automatictools to speedily provide this information. The human-performed activity of the information quality evaluation is extremelytime consuming and easily leads to failures. The application OntoQualis here described was motivated to support the qualityevaluation of Scientific Conferences, in the Computer Science area, based on the graduated programs evaluation protocol ofthe Brazilian agency CAPES. The evaluation mechanism is specified in the QUALIS document specifically designed to assess journalsand conferences ranking. This paper presents a brief vision of the ongoing process of domain analysis and ontology prototypingaiming to classify Scientific Conferences: the OntoQualis project. Some results of OntoQualis preliminary evaluation haveshown a satisfactory classification level in comparison with CAPES-QUALIS ranking.

    Oh la laClose

    Your session has expired but don’t worry, your message
    has been saved.Please log in and we’ll bring you back
    to this page. You’ll just need to click “Send”.

    Your evaluation is of great value to our authors and readers. Many thanks for your time.

    Review Close

    Short review
    Select a comment
    Select a grade
    You and the author
    Anonymity My review is anonymous( Log in  or  Register )
    publish
    Close

    When you're done, click "publish"

    Only blue fields are mandatory.

    Relation to the author*
    Overall Comment*
    Anonymity* My review is anonymous( Log in  or  Register )
     

    Focus & Objectives*

    Have the objectives and the central topic been clearly introduced?

    Novelty & Originality*

    Do you consider this work to be an interesting contribution to knowledge?

    Arrangement, Transition and Logic

    Are the different sections of this work well arranged and distributed?

    Methodology & Results

    Is the author's methodology relevant to both the objectives and the results?

    Data Settings & Figures

    Were tables and figures appropriate and well conceived?

    References and bibliography

    Is this work well documented and has the bibliography been properly established?

    Writing

    Is this work well written, checked and edited?

    Write Your Review (you can paste text as well)
    Please be civil and constructive. Thank you.


    Grade (optional, N/A by default)

    N/A 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 10
    Close

    Your mailing list is currently empty.
    It will build up as you send messages
    and links to your peers.

     No one besides you has access to this list.
    Close
    Enter the e-mail addresses of your recipients in the box below.  Note: Peer Evaluation will NOT store these email addresses   log in
    Your recipients

    Your message:

    Your email : Your email address will not be stored or shared with others.

    Your message has been sent.

    Description

    Title : An Ontological Approach for the Quality Assessment of Computer Science Conferences
    Author(s) : Maria Aparecida M Souto, Mariusa Warpechowski, José Palazzo M De Oliveira
    Abstract : Today the proliferation of the availability of the information of scientific events on the Web has created the necessity tooffer a quickly access to up-to-date information about the quality of these events. This requirement demands for (semi) automatictools to speedily provide this information. The human-performed activity of the information quality evaluation is extremelytime consuming and easily leads to failures. The application OntoQualis here described was motivated to support the qualityevaluation of Scientific Conferences, in the Computer Science area, based on the graduated programs evaluation protocol ofthe Brazilian agency CAPES. The evaluation mechanism is specified in the QUALIS document specifically designed to assess journalsand conferences ranking. This paper presents a brief vision of the ongoing process of domain analysis and ontology prototypingaiming to classify Scientific Conferences: the OntoQualis project. Some results of OntoQualis preliminary evaluation haveshown a satisfactory classification level in comparison with CAPES-QUALIS ranking.
    Subject : unspecified
    Area : Other
    Language : English
    Year : 2007

    Affiliations UFRGS
    Editors : Jean-Luc Hainaut, Elke A Rundensteiner, Markus Kirchberg, Michela Bertolotto, Mathias Brochhausen, Yi-Ping Phoebe Chen, Samira Si-Said Cherfi, Martin Doerr, Hyoil Han, Sven Hartmann, Jeffrey Parsons, Geert Poels, Colette Rolland, Juan Trujillo, Eric S K Y
    Conference_title : Advances in Conceptual Modeling – Foundations and Applications
    Volume : 4802
    Publisher : Springer
    Pages : 202-212
    Url : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76292-8_24
    Doi : 10.1007/978-3-540-76292-8

    Leave a comment

    This contribution has not been reviewed yet. review?

    You may receive the Trusted member label after :

    • Reviewing 10 uploads, whatever the media type.
    • Being trusted by 10 peers.
    • If you are blocked by 10 peers the "Trust label" will be suspended from your page. We encourage you to contact the administrator to contest the suspension.

    Does this seem fair to you? Please make your suggestions.

    Please select an affiliation to sign your evaluation:

    Cancel Evaluation Save

    Please select an affiliation:

    Cancel   Save

    José's Peer Evaluation activity

    José has...

    Trusted 0
    Reviewed 0
    Emailed 0
    Shared/re-used 0
    Discussed 0
    Invited 0
    Collected 0
    Invite this peer to...
    Title
    Start date (dd/mm/aaaa)
    Location
    URL
    Message
    send
    Close

    Full Text request

    Your request will be sent.

    Please enter your email address to be notified
    when this article becomes available

    Your email


     
    Your email address will not be shared or spammed.