New Full text for this article was not available? Send a request to the author(s).
Reading PAGE
Peer Evaluation activity
| Trusted by | 1 |
| Downloads | 2359 |
| Views | 51 |
| Full text requests | 1 |
| Collected by | 1 |
Total impact ?
Send a 
Aliaksandr has...
| Trusted | 0 |
| Reviewed | 1 |
| Emailed | 0 |
| Shared/re-used | 0 |
| Discussed | 0 |
| Invited | 0 |
| Collected | 1 |
This was brought to you by:
Followblock this user Aliaksandr Birukou Trusted member
Post Doctorate
DISI, University of Trento, Trento
LiquidPub D1.2. SKO structure, evolution, and navigation models (v3)
Oh la la
Your session has expired but don’t worry, your message
has been saved.Please log in and we’ll bring you back
to this page. You’ll just need to click “Send”.
Your evaluation is of great value to our authors and readers. Many thanks for your time.
Review 
Short review
When you're done, click "publish"
Only blue fields are mandatory.
Your mailing list is currently empty.
It will build up as you send messages
and links to your peers.
No one besides you has access to this list.
Enter the e-mail addresses of your recipients in the box below. Note: Peer Evaluation will NOT store these email addresses log in
Your message has been sent.
Description
Title : LiquidPub D1.2. SKO structure, evolution, and navigation models (v3)
Author(s) : Ronald Chenu-Abente, Fausto Giunchiglia, Daniil Mirylenka, Hao Xu
Subject : unspecified
Area : Computer Science
Language : English
Year : 2011
Editors : Ronald Chenu-Abente
Reviewers : Carles Sierra, Marcos Baez
Author(s) : Ronald Chenu-Abente, Fausto Giunchiglia, Daniil Mirylenka, Hao Xu
Abstract : This report presents an overview of the State of the Art in topics related to the on-going research in the Liquid Publications Project. The Liquid Publications Project (LiquidPub) aims to bring fundamental changes to the processes by which scientific knowledge is created, disseminated, evaluated and maintained. In order to accomplish this, many processes and areas will have to be modified. We group the areas involved in this change into four areas: creation and evolution of scientific knowledge, evaluation processes (primarily, peer-review processes and their evaluation), computational trust and reputation mechanisms, and business and process models. Due to the size and complexity of each of these four areas, we will only discuss topics that are directly related to our proposed research.
Keywords : LiquidPub, liquid, knowledge, data, semantic, science, publication, Web 2.0, artifact, reputation, tagging, SKOSubject : unspecified
Area : Computer Science
Language : English
Year : 2011
| Affiliations : | DISI, University of Trento, Trento |
Reviewers : Carles Sierra, Marcos Baez
Leave a comment
This contribution has not been reviewed yet. review?
You may receive the Trusted member label after :
• Reviewing 10 uploads, whatever the media type.
• Being trusted by 10 peers.
• If you are blocked by 10 peers the "Trust label" will be suspended from your page. We encourage you to contact the administrator to contest the suspension.
Please select an affiliation to sign your evaluation:
Please select an affiliation:
Aliaksandr's Peer Evaluation activity
| Trusted by | 1 |
- FPeer Evaluation, Publisher, Peer Evaluation.
| Downloads | 2359 |
- 557LiquidPub D2.1 - Processes, Roles and Licensing Models for SKO Lifecycle Management (v2)
- 413LiquidPub D1.1. State of the art in modelling evolutionary, collaborative, and multi-faceted knowledge artefacts; analysis of reviews and modelling of reviewers' behaviour in peer review; computational trust, reputation models, and social network analysis
- 173LiquidPub D3.3. Simulation and validation of the behavioral models
- 162LiquidPub D3.1. Analysis of Reviewing Systems (public version)
- 147LiquidPub D3.2. Model of reviewers’ behavior in peer reviews
- 145Service for selecting patterns
- 141LiquidPub D2.2 Extension to other disciplines
- 135LiquidPub D1.2. SKO structure, evolution, and navigation models (v3)
- 131LiquidPub. D2.3 - LiquidPub processes plugins (v2)
- 126LiquidPub D1.3. LiquidPub Core Platform
- 126Liquid Publications Green Paper
- 103Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation
| Views | 51 |
- 13Service for selecting patterns
- 10Requirements, configuration management and traceability for safety critical software
- 6Liquid Publications Green Paper
- 3Liquid journals: scientific journals in the Web 2.0 era
- 3A Multi-Agent System that Facilitates Scientific Publications Search
- 3IC-service
- 3LiquidPub D1.3. LiquidPub Core Platform
- 2UCount : a Community-Driven Approach for Measuring Scientific Reputation
- 2Efficient rotation invariant object detection using boosted Random Ferns
- 2LiquidPub D1.1. State of the art in modelling evolutionary, collaborative, and multi-faceted knowledge artefacts; analysis of reviews and modelling of reviewers' behaviour in peer review; computational trust, reputation models, and social network analysis
- 2LiquidPub D3.1. Analysis of Reviewing Systems (public version)
- 1LiquidPub D1.2. SKO structure, evolution, and navigation models (v3)
- 1Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation
| Full text requests | 1 |
Title of the work: Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation
- Anonymous (1)
| Collected by | 1 |
- FAliaksandr Birukou, Post Doctorate, DISI, University of Trento, Trento.
Aliaksandr has...
| Trusted | 0 |
| Reviewed | 1 |
| Emailed | 0 |
| Shared/re-used | 0 |
| Discussed | 0 |
| Invited | 0 |
| Collected | 1 |
- Aliaksandr Birukou, Post Doctorate, DISI, University of Trento, Trento.
Full Text request
Your request will be sent.
Please enter your email address to be notified
when this article becomes available
Your email
© 2010-2012, by ColDev / Collective Developments - ColDev Editions is a member of 
the citation linking backbone.