Reading PAGE
Peer Evaluation activity
| Trusted by | 1 |
| Downloads | 2366 |
| Views | 51 |
| Full text requests | 1 |
| Collected by | 1 |
Total impact ?
Send a 
Aliaksandr has...
| Trusted | 0 |
| Reviewed | 1 |
| Emailed | 0 |
| Shared/re-used | 0 |
| Discussed | 0 |
| Invited | 0 |
| Collected | 1 |
This was brought to you by:
Followblock this user Aliaksandr Birukou Trusted member
Post Doctorate
DISI, University of Trento, Trento
LiquidPub D3.3. Simulation and validation of the behavioral models
Oh la la
Your session has expired but don’t worry, your message
has been saved.Please log in and we’ll bring you back
to this page. You’ll just need to click “Send”.
Your evaluation is of great value to our authors and readers. Many thanks for your time.
Your mailing list is currently empty.
It will build up as you send messages
and links to your peers.
Enter the e-mail addresses of your recipients in the box below. Note: Peer Evaluation will NOT store these email addresses log in
Your message has been sent.
Description
Title : LiquidPub D3.3. Simulation and validation of the behavioral models
Author(s) : Matus Medo, Luo-Luo Jiang, Tao Zhou, Joseph Wakeling, Katsiaryna Mirylenka, Azzurra Ragone
Subject : unspecified
Area : Computer Science
Language : English
Year : 2010
Editors : Matus Medo
Reviewers : Azzurra Ragone, Jordi Sabater Mir
Author(s) : Matus Medo, Luo-Luo Jiang, Tao Zhou, Joseph Wakeling, Katsiaryna Mirylenka, Azzurra Ragone
Abstract : In many systems, objects from a given set (let it be movies in The Internet Movie Database or books on Amazon) can be rated by individual users. A similar situation occurs in Liquid Journals where readers may be allowed to rate papers and journals. A sophisticated algorithm, taking into account user ability or reputation, may produce a better aggregation of ratings than the simple arithmetic average. Various co-determination algorithms are available to this end with both user and object reputation iteratively refined together and resulting in improved measures of both derived directly from the rating data. However, none of the proposed algorithms has been studied on real data. We use various distinct real datasets to test several ranking algorithms, compare their results, and identify advantages and limits of each algorithm.
Keywords : LiquidPub, data mining, reputation, reputation systems, rankingSubject : unspecified
Area : Computer Science
Language : English
Year : 2010
| Affiliations : | DISI, University of Trento, Trento |
Reviewers : Azzurra Ragone, Jordi Sabater Mir

Leave a comment
This contribution has not been reviewed yet. review?
You may receive the Trusted member label after :
• Reviewing 10 uploads, whatever the media type.
• Being trusted by 10 peers.
• If you are blocked by 10 peers the "Trust label" will be suspended from your page. We encourage you to contact the administrator to contest the suspension.
Please select an affiliation to sign your evaluation:
Please select an affiliation:
Aliaksandr's Peer Evaluation activity
| Trusted by | 1 |
- FPeer Evaluation, Publisher, Peer Evaluation.
| Downloads | 2366 |
- 558LiquidPub D2.1 - Processes, Roles and Licensing Models for SKO Lifecycle Management (v2)
- 413LiquidPub D1.1. State of the art in modelling evolutionary, collaborative, and multi-faceted knowledge artefacts; analysis of reviews and modelling of reviewers' behaviour in peer review; computational trust, reputation models, and social network analysis
- 173LiquidPub D3.3. Simulation and validation of the behavioral models
- 163LiquidPub D3.1. Analysis of Reviewing Systems (public version)
- 148LiquidPub D3.2. Model of reviewers’ behavior in peer reviews
- 146Service for selecting patterns
- 141LiquidPub D2.2 Extension to other disciplines
- 135LiquidPub D1.2. SKO structure, evolution, and navigation models (v3)
- 133LiquidPub. D2.3 - LiquidPub processes plugins (v2)
- 127Liquid Publications Green Paper
- 126LiquidPub D1.3. LiquidPub Core Platform
- 103Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation
| Views | 51 |
- 13Service for selecting patterns
- 10Requirements, configuration management and traceability for safety critical software
- 6Liquid Publications Green Paper
- 3Liquid journals: scientific journals in the Web 2.0 era
- 3A Multi-Agent System that Facilitates Scientific Publications Search
- 3IC-service
- 3LiquidPub D1.3. LiquidPub Core Platform
- 2UCount : a Community-Driven Approach for Measuring Scientific Reputation
- 2Efficient rotation invariant object detection using boosted Random Ferns
- 2LiquidPub D1.1. State of the art in modelling evolutionary, collaborative, and multi-faceted knowledge artefacts; analysis of reviews and modelling of reviewers' behaviour in peer review; computational trust, reputation models, and social network analysis
- 2LiquidPub D3.1. Analysis of Reviewing Systems (public version)
- 1LiquidPub D1.2. SKO structure, evolution, and navigation models (v3)
- 1Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation
| Full text requests | 1 |
Title of the work: Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation
- Anonymous (1)
| Collected by | 1 |
- FAliaksandr Birukou, Post Doctorate, DISI, University of Trento, Trento.
Aliaksandr has...
| Trusted | 0 |
| Reviewed | 1 |
| Emailed | 0 |
| Shared/re-used | 0 |
| Discussed | 0 |
| Invited | 0 |
| Collected | 1 |
- Aliaksandr Birukou, Post Doctorate, DISI, University of Trento, Trento.
Full Text request
Your request will be sent.
Please enter your email address to be notified
when this article becomes available
Your email