Reading PAGE

Peer Evaluation activity

Downloads 22
Views 24
Full text requests 10
Followed by 1

Total impact ?

    Send a

    Peter has...

    Trusted 0
    Reviewed 0
    Emailed 0
    Shared/re-used 0
    Discussed 0
    Invited 0
    Collected 0

     

    This was brought to you by:

    block this user Peter Halligan

    Professor

    Cardiff university

    Residual haptic sensation following stroke using ipsilateral stimulation.

    Export to Mendeley

    In 1987, Weiskrantz and Zhang described a stroke patient with severe somatosensory loss who, nevertheless, demonstrated impressive residual sensory performance when required to touch the affected limb with her ipsilesional hand (self touch; ST). The current study set out to ascertain the prevalence and characteristics of self-touch enhancement (STE) in patients with unilateral stroke and hemihypaesthesia. Thirty-nine stroke patients who were referred with hemihypaesthesia fulfilled the criteria. STE was defined where a patient showed a statistically significant increase (p<0.05) in performance for (i) detection, (ii) localisation and/or (iii) perceived intensity during touch with their ipsilesional hand, compared with standard experimenter elicited sensory performance. Group comparisons between the conventional touch versus ST conditions revealed significant differences for detection (p<0.01), intensity estimation (p<0.01) and localisation (p<0.001) using ST. Twenty-two of the 39 patients (56.4%) showed STE on at least one assessment mode. In detection, 16 (41%) patients showed STE; for localisation, 12 patients (31%) showed STE and for intensity, 17 patients (44%) showed STE. Out of the 22 patients with STE, 17 had right hemisphere lesions. In summary, more than half of the stroke patients showed reliable and significant improvements in somatosensory performance when using their unaffected hand as the source of tactile stimulation. This striking phenomenon suggests that the threshold for the impaired hand is affected by active involvement of the contralateral (ipsilesional) limb when delivering the stimulus contact. Possible mechanisms to explain these findings are discussed.

    Oh la laClose

    Your session has expired but don’t worry, your message
    has been saved.Please log in and we’ll bring you back
    to this page. You’ll just need to click “Send”.

    Your evaluation is of great value to our authors and readers. Many thanks for your time.

    Review Close

    Short review
    Select a comment
    Select a grade
    You and the author
    Anonymity My review is anonymous( Log in  or  Register )
    publish
    Close

    When you're done, click "publish"

    Only blue fields are mandatory.

    Relation to the author*
    Overall Comment*
    Anonymity* My review is anonymous( Log in  or  Register )
     

    Focus & Objectives*

    Have the objectives and the central topic been clearly introduced?

    Novelty & Originality*

    Do you consider this work to be an interesting contribution to knowledge?

    Arrangement, Transition and Logic

    Are the different sections of this work well arranged and distributed?

    Methodology & Results

    Is the author's methodology relevant to both the objectives and the results?

    Data Settings & Figures

    Were tables and figures appropriate and well conceived?

    References and bibliography

    Is this work well documented and has the bibliography been properly established?

    Writing

    Is this work well written, checked and edited?

    Write Your Review (you can paste text as well)
    Please be civil and constructive. Thank you.


    Grade (optional, N/A by default)

    N/A 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 10
    Close

    Your mailing list is currently empty.
    It will build up as you send messages
    and links to your peers.

     No one besides you has access to this list.
    Close
    Enter the e-mail addresses of your recipients in the box below.  Note: Peer Evaluation will NOT store these email addresses   log in
    Your recipients

    Your message:

    Your email : Your email address will not be stored or shared with others.

    Your message has been sent.

    Description

    Title : Residual haptic sensation following stroke using ipsilateral stimulation.
    Author(s) : M Valentini, U Kischka, Peter Halligan
    Abstract : In 1987, Weiskrantz and Zhang described a stroke patient with severe somatosensory loss who, nevertheless, demonstrated impressive residual sensory performance when required to touch the affected limb with her ipsilesional hand (self touch; ST). The current study set out to ascertain the prevalence and characteristics of self-touch enhancement (STE) in patients with unilateral stroke and hemihypaesthesia. Thirty-nine stroke patients who were referred with hemihypaesthesia fulfilled the criteria. STE was defined where a patient showed a statistically significant increase (p<0.05) in performance for (i) detection, (ii) localisation and/or (iii) perceived intensity during touch with their ipsilesional hand, compared with standard experimenter elicited sensory performance. Group comparisons between the conventional touch versus ST conditions revealed significant differences for detection (p<0.01), intensity estimation (p<0.01) and localisation (p<0.001) using ST. Twenty-two of the 39 patients (56.4%) showed STE on at least one assessment mode. In detection, 16 (41%) patients showed STE; for localisation, 12 patients (31%) showed STE and for intensity, 17 patients (44%) showed STE. Out of the 22 patients with STE, 17 had right hemisphere lesions. In summary, more than half of the stroke patients showed reliable and significant improvements in somatosensory performance when using their unaffected hand as the source of tactile stimulation. This striking phenomenon suggests that the threshold for the impaired hand is affected by active involvement of the contralateral (ipsilesional) limb when delivering the stimulus contact. Possible mechanisms to explain these findings are discussed.
    Subject : unspecified
    Area : Other
    Language : English
    Year : 2008

    Affiliations Cardiff university
    Journal : Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
    Volume : 79
    Issue : 3
    Publisher : British Medical Association
    Pages : 266-270
    Url : http://orca.cf.ac.uk/5653/

    Leave a comment

    This contribution has not been reviewed yet. review?

    You may receive the Trusted member label after :

    • Reviewing 10 uploads, whatever the media type.
    • Being trusted by 10 peers.
    • If you are blocked by 10 peers the "Trust label" will be suspended from your page. We encourage you to contact the administrator to contest the suspension.

    Does this seem fair to you? Please make your suggestions.

    Please select an affiliation to sign your evaluation:

    Cancel Evaluation Save

    Please select an affiliation:

    Cancel   Save

    Peter's Peer Evaluation activity

    Downloads 22
    Views 24
    Full text requests 10
    Followed by 1

    Peter has...

    Trusted 0
    Reviewed 0
    Emailed 0
    Shared/re-used 0
    Discussed 0
    Invited 0
    Collected 0
    Invite this peer to...
    Title
    Start date (dd/mm/aaaa)
    Location
    URL
    Message
    send
    Close

    Full Text request

    Your request will be sent.

    Please enter your email address to be notified
    when this article becomes available

    Your email


     
    Your email address will not be shared or spammed.