Peer Evaluation activity
|Full text requests||5|
This was brought to you by:
Followblock this user Robert Frodeman
Philosophy and Religion Studies, University of North Texas, Denton
The Dedisciplining of Peer Review
Your session has expired but don’t worry, your message
has been saved.Please log in and we’ll bring you back
to this page. You’ll just need to click “Send”.
Your mailing list is currently empty.
It will build up as you send messages
and links to your peers.
Your message has been sent.
Author(s) : Robert Frodeman
Subject : Science policy - Peer review
Area : Philosophy
Language : English
Year : 2012
|Affiliations :||Philosophy and Religion Studies, University of North Texas, Denton|
Volume : 50
Issue : 1
Doi : 10.1007/s11024-012-9192-8
Leave a comment
This contribution has not been reviewed yet. review?
You may receive the Trusted member label after :
• Reviewing 10 uploads, whatever the media type.
• Being trusted by 10 peers.
• If you are blocked by 10 peers the "Trust label" will be suspended from your page. We encourage you to contact the administrator to contest the suspension.
Please select an affiliation to sign your evaluation:
Please select an affiliation:
Robert's Peer Evaluation activity
- 607The Dedisciplining of Peer Review
- 5Being and space: a re-reading of existential spatiality in Being and Time
- 4What is it like to be a geologist? A phenomenology of geology and its epistemological implications
- 3Interdisciplinary research and academic sustainability: managing knowledge in an age of accountability
- 1Geological reasoning: Geology as an interpretive and historical science
- 1De-Disciplining the Humanities
- 30The Dedisciplining of Peer Review
- 2What is it like to be a geologist? A phenomenology of geology and its epistemological implications
- 2Corrosive Effects: Environmental Ethics and the Metaphysics of Acid Mine Drainage
- 2Being and space: a re-reading of existential spatiality in Being and Time
- 1Interdisciplinary research and academic sustainability: managing knowledge in an age of accountability
- 1Intellectual Merit and Broader Impact: The National Science Foundation's Broader Impacts Criterion and the Question of Peer Review
- 1Science and the public self [Technology in Society 2000; 22: 341-352]
|Full text requests||5|
Title of the work: The Dedisciplining of Peer Review
- Anonymous (5)
- FEmanuel Kulczycki, Assistant Professor, Institute of Philosophy, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.
- FJ. Britt Holbrook, Other, Center for the Study of Interdisciplinarity, University of North Texas, School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Philosophy of/as Interdisciplinarity Network, Public Philosophy Network.
- FKelli Barr, Junior professional, Department of Philosophy and Religion Studies, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, Center for the Study of Interdisicplinarity, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, Eckerd College, St. Petersburg, FL.
Full Text request
Your request will be sent.
Please enter your email address to be notified
when this article becomes available