Reading PAGE

Peer Evaluation activity

Trusted by 1
Emailed by 1
Downloads 10
Views 34
Full text requests 1
Followed by 3

Total impact ?

    Send a

    Laurent has...

    Trusted 0
    Reviewed 0
    Emailed 0
    Shared/re-used 0
    Discussed 0
    Invited 0
    Collected 0

     

    This was brought to you by:

    block this user Laurent Romary Trusted member

    Senior Research Fellow

    Inria

    Referring to objects with spoken and haptic modalities

    Export to Mendeley

    The gesture input modality considered in multimodal dialogue systems is mainly reduced to pointing or manipulating actions. With an approach based on spontaneous character of the communication, the treatment of such actions involves many processes. Without constraints, the user may use gesture in association with speech, and may exploit visual context peculiarities, guiding her/his articulation of gesture trajectories and her/his choice of words. Semantic interpretation of multimodal utterances also becomes a complex problem, taking into account varieties of referring expressions, varieties of gestural trajectories, structural parameters from the visual context, and also directives from a specific task. Following the spontaneous approach, we propose to give maximal understanding capabilities to dialogue systems, to ensure that various interaction modes must be taken into account. Considering the development of haptic sense devices (such as PHANToM) which increase the capabilities of sensations, particularly tactile and kinesthetic, we propose to explore a new domain of research concerning the integration of haptic gesture into multimodal dialogue systems, in terms of its possible associations with speech for object reference and manipulation. We focus on the compatibility between haptic gesture and multimodal reference models, and on the consequences of processing this new modality on intelligent system architectures, which has been sufficiently studied from a semantic point of view.

    Oh la laClose

    Your session has expired but don’t worry, your message
    has been saved.Please log in and we’ll bring you back
    to this page. You’ll just need to click “Send”.

    Your evaluation is of great value to our authors and readers. Many thanks for your time.

    Review Close

    Short review
    Select a comment
    Select a grade
    You and the author
    Anonymity My review is anonymous( Log in  or  Register )
    publish
    Close

    When you're done, click "publish"

    Only blue fields are mandatory.

    Relation to the author*
    Overall Comment*
    Anonymity* My review is anonymous( Log in  or  Register )
     

    Focus & Objectives*

    Have the objectives and the central topic been clearly introduced?

    Novelty & Originality*

    Do you consider this work to be an interesting contribution to knowledge?

    Arrangement, Transition and Logic

    Are the different sections of this work well arranged and distributed?

    Methodology & Results

    Is the author's methodology relevant to both the objectives and the results?

    Data Settings & Figures

    Were tables and figures appropriate and well conceived?

    References and bibliography

    Is this work well documented and has the bibliography been properly established?

    Writing

    Is this work well written, checked and edited?

    Write Your Review (you can paste text as well)
    Please be civil and constructive. Thank you.


    Grade (optional, N/A by default)

    N/A 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 10
    Close

    Your mailing list is currently empty.
    It will build up as you send messages
    and links to your peers.

     No one besides you has access to this list.
    Close
    Enter the e-mail addresses of your recipients in the box below.  Note: Peer Evaluation will NOT store these email addresses   log in
    Your recipients

    Your message:

    Your email : Your email address will not be stored or shared with others.

    Your message has been sent.

    Description

    Title : Referring to objects with spoken and haptic modalities
    Author(s) : F. Landragin, N. Bellalem, L. Romary
    Abstract : The gesture input modality considered in multimodal dialogue systems is mainly reduced to pointing or manipulating actions. With an approach based on spontaneous character of the communication, the treatment of such actions involves many processes. Without constraints, the user may use gesture in association with speech, and may exploit visual context peculiarities, guiding her/his articulation of gesture trajectories and her/his choice of words. Semantic interpretation of multimodal utterances also becomes a complex problem, taking into account varieties of referring expressions, varieties of gestural trajectories, structural parameters from the visual context, and also directives from a specific task. Following the spontaneous approach, we propose to give maximal understanding capabilities to dialogue systems, to ensure that various interaction modes must be taken into account. Considering the development of haptic sense devices (such as PHANToM) which increase the capabilities of sensations, particularly tactile and kinesthetic, we propose to explore a new domain of research concerning the integration of haptic gesture into multimodal dialogue systems, in terms of its possible associations with speech for object reference and manipulation. We focus on the compatibility between haptic gesture and multimodal reference models, and on the consequences of processing this new modality on intelligent system architectures, which has been sufficiently studied from a semantic point of view.
    Subject : unspecified
    Area : Other
    Language : English
    Year : 2002

    Affiliations Inria
    Journal : Proceedings Fourth IEEE International Conference on Multimodal I
    Publisher : IEEE Comput. Soc
    Pages : 99 - 104
    Url : http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=1166976
    Isbn : 0-7695-1834-6
    Doi : 10.1109/ICMI.2002.1166976

    Leave a comment

    This contribution has not been reviewed yet. review?

    You may receive the Trusted member label after :

    • Reviewing 10 uploads, whatever the media type.
    • Being trusted by 10 peers.
    • If you are blocked by 10 peers the "Trust label" will be suspended from your page. We encourage you to contact the administrator to contest the suspension.

    Does this seem fair to you? Please make your suggestions.

    Please select an affiliation to sign your evaluation:

    Cancel Evaluation Save

    Please select an affiliation:

    Cancel   Save

    Laurent's Peer Evaluation activity

    Trusted by 1
    Emailed by 1
    • Anonymous : 1
    Downloads 10
    Views 34
    Full text requests 1

    Title of the work: Combing Over the Polycomb Group Proteins

    • Anonymous (1)
    Followed by 3

    Laurent has...

    Trusted 0
    Reviewed 0
    Emailed 0
    Shared/re-used 0
    Discussed 0
    Invited 0
    Collected 0
    Invite this peer to...
    Title
    Start date (dd/mm/aaaa)
    Location
    URL
    Message
    send
    Close

    Full Text request

    Your request will be sent.

    Please enter your email address to be notified
    when this article becomes available

    Your email


     
    Your email address will not be shared or spammed.